Owner
The AD office inherits the risk and the budget question.
The activity comes from the other three sides. The audit trail and the operating readout still land on the department.
Back office for athletic departments
Built for the people who answer for the money.
Most NIL software is a marketing surface for the athlete. Proslync is the back-office record for the athletic department: roster, deal volume, compliance posture, and platform economics in one product frame your finance team can inspect.
Built for the AD office, not affiliated with the NCAA, the CSC, or any school.
Investor-grade back-office narrative
The AD tab is the institutional buyer thesis.
The back office route should read like the reason the budget owner buys: weekly volume, flags, reviewer queues, House-era cap context, export posture, and a clean separation between platform economics and school-to-athlete revenue-share context.
Control
Finance, compliance, operations, and executives see different controls.
The route maps the product to real owners: ledger separation, reviewer evidence, queue ownership, and export posture.
Rules
Rules are source-carded context, not automatic approval.
School policy, state law, NCAA Bylaw 22, and House-era context stay labeled, dated, and human-reviewed.
Economics
Two ledgers keep the investment story clean.
Platform economics are described separately from school-to-athlete cap context, with no public pricing or legal advice.
Back-office operating visual
The AD cockpit is a weekly operating readout.
Investors should see a department workflow, not a compliance badge: volume, flags, ledger boundary, reviewer state, and export readiness.
AD cockpit surfaces are public route/product framing today; live AD-only deployment is not claimed.
Deal volume
83%
Weekly rollup
Campaigns, athlete disclosures, brand holds, and proof status.
Risk queue
75%
Human review
Named owners, source cards, caveats, and escalation state.
Ledger boundary
70%
2 ledgers
Platform economics separate from school-to-athlete cap context.
Export posture
66%
Audit trail
What closed, what is pending, and what evidence would export.
Roster risk
One screen for who’s clear, on hold, and in review.
The AD’s real question is “any flags I need to escalate?” Proslync answers it on one screen, every athlete with a review state and the open holds surfaced, so escalation is a glance, not a round of emails. The state is a human decision; the queue just makes it legible.
Agent provenance
Agents don’t sign up. They get called up.
There is no public registration gate for agents. An athlete or an agency issues the invitation, the client accepts it, and only then does the agent appear on a deal. Every agent in the system traces to someone who vouched for them. When an auditor asks who this person is and why they were in the room, the answer is on the record.
Rules we pre-flight against
Compliance lives on the deal, not a separate system.
Every brief is checked against four rule sets before it leaves the room. Nothing below is opinion, these are the public-record rules an athletic department already answers to.
The binding one
House v. NCAA settlement (2024)
Settlement-era constraints on direct school-to-athlete revenue sharing, a year-one cap of about $20.5M per school (per the settlement approved June 2025; forward revenue sharing in effect; back-damages appeals pending).
Source: In re College Athlete NIL Litigation, N.D. Cal. 4:20-cv-03919
School policy
Per-school NIL policy, conference overlay, and sport-specific carve-outs applied to the campaign category.
Source: Per-school manuals
State NIL law
State NIL statutes applied to the athlete's residency and the school's jurisdiction.
Source: State statutes (per athlete)
NCAA Bylaw 22
NCAA Division-I student-athlete NIL bylaw, 2024-08-01 manual revision and forward.
Source: NCAA D-I Manual, Bylaw 22
The rule sets above are the categories the platform is organized around. The data model behind each set is being built one track at a time and is reflected in the public product tour.
Athlete disclosure
NIL Go-style disclosure, on the deal record.
The College Sports Commission’s NIL Go workflow is the design exemplar for athlete-side disclosure: short, clear, and attached to the deal it describes. Proslync follows the same shape, and skips the second system, because the disclosure rides the deal record the brand and the school already see.
Reference: College Sports Commission, NIL Go disclosure workflow (publicly available CSC documentation, 2025). CSC NIL Go is cited as an exemplar. Proslync is independent of the CSC; the reference is to the workflow shape, not to any affiliation or partnership.
Three fields, one record
- 01Commercial termsPlain-English value label, pulled from the same record the brand approved.
- 02Brand & deliverablesBrand name, post type, and a short list of deliverables.
- 03Compliance postureSchool policy, state rule, NCAA Bylaw 22, and House-era context, already evaluated upstream.
Two ledgers, never crossed
The platform fee lives off the cap.
The 2024 House v. NCAA settlement governs how schools share revenue with athletes, a year-one cap of about $20.5M per school (as approved June 2025; forward revenue sharing in effect; back-damages appeals pending). The fee an AD pays Proslync rides a separate ledger, formally decoupled from the cap, so platform economics never compete with the athlete’s share.
Ledger one
School ↔ Athlete revenue share
Governed by House v. NCAA (settlement approved June 2025; forward revenue sharing in effect). Cap context: about $20.5M / school / year (year-one figure under the approved settlement). Tracked alongside Bylaw 22, conference policy, and state law.
Source: House v. NCAA settlement approved June 2025; forward revenue sharing in effect; back-damages appeals pending.
Ledger two · off the cap
Proslync ↔ AD platform fee
Platform economics, a department fee for running deals through Proslync. Decoupled from the 2024 House cap, never on the same ledger as the athlete’s share. Shown as a capability, not a published price.
Live vs fixture
What is real versus fixture on the back-office route.
The route can be direct about the buyer pain while staying precise about House-era context, legal posture, and product state.
Live surface
Rendered marketing route
Source: src/app/(marketing)/back-office/page.tsx and shared proof strips.
It proves the AD buyer narrative, not a deployed department cockpit.
Illustrative data
Department workflow model
Source: Static approval-queue, risk-rollup, and readiness figures.
Every figure on the route is modeled structure, not a measured department result.
Public rule context
Source-carded posture
Source: NCAA Bylaw 22, school/state categories, and House v. NCAA approved-settlement context (June 2025).
Rules are workflow context only and remain subject to counsel and human reviewer decisions.
Economics boundary
No public pricing
Source: Two-ledger copy and investor guardrail.
The public route does not state a fee schedule, guarantee savings, or commingle platform fees with athlete revenue share.
Order of operations
Brand-side first, athlete-side next, with the department cockpit running alongside both. The build sequence is intentional and set with the operating org.
Governance
Built under a client-ownership engagement. AI logic structures pass to the operating org on completion. Proslync the platform is the consumer, not the owner, of those structures.
Independence
Proslync is independent of the NCAA, the College Sports Commission, and any individual school. References to Bylaw 22, the 2024 House settlement, and NIL Go are to public rules and public workflows.
AD cockpit surfaces are described and source-linked. Deal-record and ledger surfaces shown here render against illustrative demo data, not a live customer deployment.
The close
Bring the back office into the room.
The AD office owns the risk, the budget, and the audit narrative. Proslync gives that office one inspectable record, roster risk, disclosure, and two-ledger economics, instead of four stakeholder tools that never reconcile.
The back-office pitch is the budget rationale. ProsMatch shows the decision support; the investor room closes the fund-and-build ask.
AD cockpit surfaces are described and source-linked; ledger and deal-record surfaces render against illustrative demo data, not a live deployment.